Concerns with energy supplements with low quality forages
Two weeks ago, Greg Lardy provided an excellent discussion on the value of protein supplementation for cattle using low quality forages, such as dormant native range. A common question that is often asked is if we can substitute cheaper feedstuffs that are high in energy but low in protein in place of higher priced protein supplements. Typical energy supplements include most feed grains, particularly corn or barley, but also include byproducts such as sugar beet pulp or soy hulls. We have all seen the dramatic drop in corn prices in recent weeks, so it is likely that some folks may be wondering if cheaper corn may work as a supplement.
Unfortunately, these high-energy, low-protein feedstuffs do not stimulate the same positive responses in fiber digestion by ruminants that a protein supplement does. In fact, with feedstuffs that are high in starch, meaning any kind of grain, we typically see a negative effect on fiber utilization.
In general, the negative effect occurs for two reasons. First, adequate rumen-degradable protein is not provided to the rumen microbes to stimulate growth of fiber-digesting microbes. Second, inclusion of starch from grain-based supplements interferes with fiber digestion. Rumen microbes will preferentially digest the starch before they digest fiber, so fiber digestion actually decreases. Also, at higher levels of grain, rapid fermentation of the starch lowers rumen pH, which is harmful to the fiber-digesting bacteria.
Once there has been a negative effect on fiber digestion, the subsequent effect is reduced forage intake. This is because there are two aspects of digestion that are negatively impacted, both the total amount of forage that is digested and also the rate at which it is digested. Once the rate of digestion slows down, then passage of feed out of the rumen is slowed. Forage intake cannot occur at a rate faster than the rate at which forage disappears from the digestive tract, whether by digestion or passage. Thus, if starch-based supplements slow the rates of both digestion and passage, then they will also reduce intake.
In general, relatively small amounts (less than 10 percent of diet dry matter) of starch-based supplements can be fed with little or no negative effects on forage utilization, but the negative effects escalate in proportion to the level of supplemental grain beyond that.
Typically, cows in moderate or higher body condition should be able to maintain themselves on dormant range with adequate protein supplementation. What if cows are thinner than desired and gaining condition before calving is a goal? Providing energy so they can gain weight would seem desirable, but grain-based supplements usually won’t give the desired results because of the negative effect on forage utilization. Under these circumstances, some of the byproducts that contain readily digestible fiber provide a viable alternative to add supplemental energy to the diet.
Two common feedstuffs that fit this scenario are soyhulls and sugar beet pulp. Both have levels of energy and protein that are nearly the same as feed grain, but contain primarily fiber and little starch. Even without the negative effect of starch, these energy feedstuffs still have limitations so they should not be fed at excessive levels. First, they still do not provide supplemental protein. Second, while they don’t necessarily decrease fiber digestion, high levels of inclusion in the diet still means they take space in the rumen and act more as a substitute than addition to the forage in the diet.
The bottom line is that protein is the first limiting nutrient in utilization of low-quality forages. Supplementing protein not only improves the protein status of the cow, but also her energy status. Energy supplements should only be considered on a limited basis and as an add-on after supplemental protein has been provided.
email ken olson at email@example.com