USDA delays GIPSA rule, to mixed reaction |

USDA delays GIPSA rule, to mixed reaction

The Agriculture Department’s Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) today announced that it is delaying the effective date of the Scope of Sections 202(a) and (b) of the Packers and Stockyards Act interim final rule that the Obama administration called the Farmer Fair Practices Rules for 180 days until October 19.

In a separate action today, USDA announced that it is also asking the public to comment on four possible actions USDA should take in regard to the disposition of the interim final rule. The comment due date is June 12, 2017.

“The extension allows ample time for stakeholders to review the effects of the Scope Interim Final Rule on their operations, and ensures maximum opportunity for dialogue across every segment of the livestock, meat, and poultry industries,” said GIPSA Acting Administrator Randall Jones.

The announcements are scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on Tuesday.

Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Pat Roberts, R-Kan., praised the decision, as did pork, chicken and beef producers. But two groups called the move against the interest of farmers, and called on Agriculture secretary nominee Sonny Perdue to work to finalize the rule once he is confirmed, as expected, and in office.

“The Obama administration made the imprudent decision to finalize this rule on their way out the door,” Roberts said. “I hope the Trump administration’s USDA will finally heed the concerns of farmers and ranchers and the Congress to get rid of this unneeded and unwanted rule.”

The National Chicken Council, the National Pork Producers Council and National Cattlemen’s Beef Association also praised the decision.

“We’re extremely pleased that the Trump administration has extended the time it has to review this regulation and the public comments on it, which will show the devastating effects this rule would have on America’s pork producers,” said NPPC President Ken Maschhoff, a pork producer from Carlyle, Ill.

“The regulation likely would restrict the buying and selling of livestock, lead to consolidation of the livestock industry — putting farmers out of business — and increase consumer prices for meat,” Maschhoff said.

“This is another step toward commonsense and away from counterproductive government intrusion in the free market,” said National Cattlemen’s Beef Association President Craig Uden. “That said, while a delay is welcome, ultimately this rule should be killed and American cattle producers should be free to market our beef without the threat of government-sanctioned frivolous lawsuits.”

The American Farm Bureau Federation issued a more measured response. Farm Bureau Federation President Zippy Duvall said, “It is clear that a one-size-fits-all approach to the Agriculture Department’s Farmer Fair Practices Rules does not work across the board for all livestock sectors. The announced delay in the rules’ effective date until October will give farmers and ranchers additional time to comment on this important issue.”

“We support preserving the contract and marketing arrangements that are working for the beef and pork sectors, and we will reinforce that point during the comment period. There is still vast room for improvement, however, in efforts to ensure a level playing field for poultry farmers. We will continue to emphasize the need to seek additional safeguards in the poultry sector to better protect individual farmers from discriminatory treatment, without disrupting the business practices that are working in the beef and pork sectors.”

But Ferd Hoefner of the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition said, “Make no mistake, the delay in implementation of this important rule is anti-farmer.”

“The rule will help level the playing field for family farmers and ensure they have some recourse when their rights under the law are violated,” Hoefner said. “We hope and expect that when Sonny Perdue is confirmed as the next secretary of Agriculture he and President Trump will support farmers and finalize the rule.”

R-CALF USA was frustrated with the delay.

“Had the agency proposed a 60-day extension to provide the soon-to-be-confirmed Secretary of Agriculture time to evaluated this important rule, we would have agreed. But that’s not what the agency did. Instead, it has set the rule on a course for defeat by establishing an inexcusably long delay and by proposing a new rule that essentially seeks a vote on whether the rule should even go into effect,” said R-CALF USA CEO Bill Bullard.

“This is unprecedented and reveals that special interests are heavily influencing the agency. The agency received over 60,000 comments in response to the 2010 attempt to first implement this critical rule, the vast majority of which favored the rule. There is no justification for such a long delay.”

The United States Cattlemen’s Association was disappointed as well said the group’s Marketing Committee Chairman Allan Sents.“Once again, efforts to advance competition and transparency in the cattle market have been stalled. Clarifications within the Packers and Stockyards Act that would define true price discovery and combat anti-competitive buying practices are being left on the table. The Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration must be equipped with the tools necessary to provide adequate oversight of our industry and the Farmer Fair Practices Rules are a starting point to work that is still needed. USCA will continue to work with the Administration and Congress to ensure these needed clarifications are moved forward.”

–The Hagstrom Report and staff reporting

AG Political Issues

See more

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User